Abstract
An inherent qualification of systematic reviews is that they attempt to collate all relevant empirical evidence. While properly conducted systematic reviews are considered the gold standard for determining health care policy and clinical decision making, they are vulnerable to publication bias1. Publication bias occurs when statistically nonsignificant data from unpublished literature are omitted from systematic reviews and meta-analyses2.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.