Prognostic factors and its predictive value in patients with metastatic spinal cancer

paythelady.612 shared this article with you from Inoreader Prognostic factors and its predictive value in patients with metastatic spinal cancer Μέσω pubmed: "world j clin cases"... World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jul 16;9(20):5470-5478. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5470. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The spine is the most common location of metastatic diseases. Treating a metastatic spinal tumor depends on many factors, including patients' overall health and life expectancy. The present study was conducted to investigate prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with vertebral metastases. AIM: To investigate prognostic factors and their predictive value in patients with metastatic spinal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 109 patients with metastatic spinal cancer was conducted between January 2015 and September 2017. The prognoses and survival were analyzed, and the effects of factors such as clinical features, treatment methods, primary lesions and affected spinal segments on the prognosis of patients with metastatic spinal cancer were discussed. The prognostic value of Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale, metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) and the revised Tokuhashi score for prediction of prognosis was explored in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. RESULTS: Age, comorbidity of metastasis from elsewhere, treatment methods, the number of spinal tumors, patient's attitude toward tumors and Karnofsky performance scale score have an effect on the prognosis of patients (all P < 0.05). With respect to classification of spinal cord injury, before operation, the proportion of grade B and grade C was higher in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived, and that of grade D and grade E was lower in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived (all P < 0.05). At 1 mo after operation, the proportion of grade A, B and C was higher in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived, and that of grade E was lower in patients in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived (all P < 0.05). MSCC occurred in four (14.3%) patients in the survival group and 17 (21.0%) patients in the death group (P < 0.05). All patients suffered from intractable pain, dysfunction in spinal cord and even paralysis. The proportion of SINS score of 1 to 6 points was lower in the death group than in the survival group, and the proportion of SINS score of 7 to 12 points was higher in the death group than in the survival group (all P < 0.05). The proportion of revised Tokuhashi score of 0 to 8 points and 9 to 11 points were higher in the death group than in the survival group, and the proportion of revised Tokuhashi score of 12 to 15 points was lower in the death group than in the survival group (all P < 0.05). Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale, MSCC, SINS and revised Tokuhashi score were important factors influenci ng the surgical treatment of patients with metastatic spinal cancer (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale, MSCC, SINS and revised Tokuhashi score were helpful in predicting the prognosis of patients with metastatic spinal cancer. PMID:34307601 | PMC:PMC8281408 | DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5470 View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.