Comparison of the application value of two commonly used minimally invasive spinal surgery in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader Comparison of the application value of two commonly used minimally invasive spinal surgery in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation Via Experimental and therapeutic medicine Exp Ther Med. 2021 Apr;21(4):299. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9730. Epub 2021 Jan 28. ABSTRACT The aim of the study was to compare the application value of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). From January 2017 to July 2018, 108 LDH patients undergoing surgical treatment in our hospital were collected and divided into PTED group (treated with PTED, n=50) and MED group (treated with MED, n=58). The operation parameter index level, complications, recurrence and pain score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale (JOA) were compared between the two groups. VAS, ODI and JOA scores of the two groups were significantly decreased after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Complications and recurrence of the two groups were similar (P>0.05) . MED was superior to PTED in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy and operation time, while PTED was superior to MED in intraoperative blood loss, incision length, length of hospital stay and bed rest time (P<0.05). Both PTED and MED can effectively treat LDH. Referring to clinical data, PTED may be the first choice for LDH treatment. PMID:33717242 | PMC:PMC7885071 | DOI:10.3892/etm.2021.9730 View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.