Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology

Certificate of Added Qualification in Advanced Diagnostic Bronchoscopy No abstract available

AABIP Indwelling Pleural Catheter Guidelines: Another Milestone for the Journal and Our Field No abstract available

You Can't Improve What You Can't Measure: Smart Learning Meets Rigid Bronchoscopy No abstract available

AABIP Evidence-informed Guidelines and Expert Panel Report for the Management of Indwelling Pleural Catheters Background: While the efficacy of Indwelling pleural catheters for palliation of malignant pleural effusions is supported by relatively robust evidence, there is less clarity surrounding the postinsertion management. Methods: The Trustworthy Consensus-Based Statement approach was utilized to develop unbiased, scientifically valid guidance for the management of patients with malignant effusions treated with indwelling pleural catheters. A comprehensive electronic database search of PubMed was performed based on a priori crafted PICO questions (Population/Intervention/Comparator/Outcomes paradigm). Manual searches of the literature were performed to identify additional relevant literature. Dual screenings at the title, abstract, and full-text levels were performed. Identified studies were then assessed for quality based on a combination of validated tools. Appropriateness for data pooling and formation of evidence-based recommendations was assessed using predetermined criteria. All panel members participated in development of the final recommendations utilizing the modified Delphi technique. Results: A total of 7 studies were identified for formal quality assessment, all of which were deemed to have a high risk of bias. There was insufficient evidence to allow for data pooling and formation of any evidence-based recommendations. Panel consensus resulted in 11 ungraded consensus-based recommendations. Conclusion: This manuscript was developed to provide clinicians with guidance on the management of patients with indwelling pleural catheters placed for palliation of malignant pleural effusions. Through a systematic and rigorous process, management suggestions were developed based on the best available evidence with augmentation by expert opinion when necessary. In addition, these guidelines highlight important gaps in knowledge which require further study.

Characterization of Applied Forces and Torques During Rigid Bronchoscopy Intubation Background: Rigid bronchoscopy intubation poses a significant risk of complication to patients from mechanical trauma. Despite the importance of precision in forces exerted by surgeons during intubation, no prior study has analyzed the overall forces and torques involved in rigid bronchoscopy intubation, and whether existing training modalities accurately replicate them. Methods: A bronchoscope was equipped with a 6-axis load sensor to measure forces and torques applied during rigid bronchoscopy intubation. The device was applied to measure intubation forces in low-fidelity manikins and patients by interventional pulmonologists. Results: Axial and lateral forces were measured during rigid bronchoscope intubation from the mouth to the mid-trachea. The mean axial/lateral forces recorded during manikin trials were 6.93/18.06 N, whereas those recorded during patient trials were 4.57/9.43 N. Average axial and lateral force application was therefore 51.6% and 92.6% higher in manikin, respectively. Applied axial torque averaged across all human trials was 130.5 N-mm compared with 78.3 N-mm for manikin trials, 40% lower in manikin than in human. Lateral torque application during manikin intubation showed greater variation in between trials and a greater range of SDs within trials. Conclusion: This was the first application of a rigid bronchoscope measurement device designed to measure forces applied at the handle. Force and torque discrepancies between manikin training and patient applications were found, indicating a possible mismatch between the haptic feedback received by physicians during rigid training and application. This inconsistency could be resolved via novel haptic training modalities and help increase atraumatic intubations.

The Incidence of Hemorrhagic Complications Was Lower With the Guide Sheath Than With the Conventional Forceps Biopsy Method: Results of Bronchoscopy in the 2016 Nationwide Survey by the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy Background: The Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy performed a nationwide survey to evaluate the current status and complications of bronchoscopy. Data on deaths due to bronchoscopy, complications after bronchoscopy, and particularly, complications of forceps biopsy were surveyed. Methods: The survey form was mailed to 532 facilities accredited by the society. The numbers of procedures, complications, and deaths were investigated. Results: The response rate was 79.1% (421 facilities). Deaths attributable to diagnostic bronchoscopy occurred in 11 (0.011%) of 98,497 cases. In regards to forceps biopsy, the guide sheath method was applied in 23,916 cases and the conventional method in 31,419 cases was done with conventional method. Complications of forceps biopsy developed in 1019 cases in total, with an incidence rate of 1.84%. The most frequent complication was pneumothorax (0.70%), followed by pneumonia/pleurisy (0.46%) and hemorrhage (0.45%). The incidence of hemorrhagic complication was significantly lower in the guide sheath group than in the non-guide sheath group (0.29% vs. 0.58%; P<0.001). The overall incidence of complications (1.63% vs. 2.00%; P=0.002) and the mortality rate (0% vs. 0.02%; P=0.04) were significantly lower in the guide sheath group. Conclusion: The incidence of hemorrhagic complications in forceps biopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions was lower when the guide sheath method was applied. It is necessary to increase the awareness for safety control in diagnostic bronchoscopy for new procedures.

High-flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Standard Oxygen During Flexible Bronchoscopy in Lung Transplant Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Background: Diagnostic and interventional flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is increasingly utilized in complex and high-risk patients. Patients are often sedated for comfort and procedure facilitation and hypoxia is commonly observed in this setting. We hypothesized that high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) would reduce the incidence of patients experiencing oxygen desaturation. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, postlung transplant patients booked for FB with transbronchial lung biopsy were assigned to either HFNO or low-flow nasal oxygen (LFNO). The patient and bronchoscopist were blinded to group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing mild desaturation [peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)<94%]. Secondary endpoints included desaturation (SpO2<90%), the number of airway interventions required and procedure interruptions, the duration of oxygen desaturation and patient, bronchoscopist and anesthesiologist satisfaction scores. Results: The trial analyzed data from 76 patients (LFNO, n=39; HFNO, n=37). HFNO reduced the proportion of patients experiencing SpO2<94% (43.2% vs. 89.7%, P<0.001) and SpO2<90% (16.2% vs. 69.2%, P<0.001). The FB was interrupted 11 times in 9 patients in the LFNO group, whereas there were no interruptions in the HFNO group. There were no differences in patient and bronchoscopist satisfaction scores between groups, anesthesiologists had higher satisfaction scores when using HFNO (P<0.001). Conclusion: Hypoxia occurred less commonly in postlung transplant patients receiving HFNO during FB. Further studies are warranted in other high-risk populations undergoing longer duration FB.

Is Additional Nebulized Lidocaine Helpful in Flexible Bronchoscopy?: A Meta-Analysis Background: Conflicting evidence of nebulized lidocaine use in bronchoscopy still exist. This study will identify whether there is any difference in various patient-related, physician-related, or procedure-related outcomes with and without lidocaine nebulization before the procedure. Method: The authors performed a search in 4 electronic databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Virtual Health Library, and Google Scholar from inception to August 2019. Data on patient-reported and physician-reported outcomes, doses of sedation, and lidocaine were extracted and pooled into standardized mean difference (SMD) and mean difference (MD) using the random-effect model. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials with 1366 patients were included. Cough was not different between the nebulized lidocaine group and no nebulized lidocaine group (SMD, −0.12; 95% confidence interval, −0.82 to 0.59; I2, 95%; P=0.75), so as operator's satisfaction score, ease of the procedure, patient's discomfort, and unwillingness to repeat the procedure. Additional nebulized lidocaine group required higher lidocaine dose (MD, 81.93; 95% confidence interval, 17.14-146.71). Studies using only local anesthesia favored the "no additional lidocaine" group in improving cough, operator's satisfaction score, and ease of the procedure. Subgroup analysis of studies using moderate sedation showed a decrease in midazolam dose and duration of the procedure in the "additional nebulized lidocaine group." Conclusion: Additional administration of nebulized lidocaine increased the total dose of lidocaine used and did not improve cough symptoms, operator-satisfaction score, ease of the procedure, and willingness to repeat the procedure. Subgroup analysis of studies using moderate sedation showed a decrease in midazolam use and in procedure duration but the clinical significance of these findings is uncertain.

Utility and Safety of Airway Stenting in Distal Airways Stenosis After Lung Transplant Background: Airway complications after lung transplantation are a difficult to treat clinical entity. A subset of these patients develop progressive distal airway stenosis (DAS) and a total loss of lobar airways. Stents may be placed to prevent continued obstruction. However, there is little data to suggest stent placement provides durable airway patency or a reduction in the need for further interventions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using patients with DAS who underwent a variety of interventions. Demographic information and complications were described using nonparametric methods. Lung function at 1 year and bronchoscopies per month were compared between stented and nonstented patients using a Mann-Whitney test. For patients treated with stenting, bronchoscopies per month were compared before and after stenting using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Airway patency was compared between stented and nonstented patients using the Fischer exact test. Results: Eleven airways were identified as DAS phenotype, 5 of which were treated with stents. Within the stented airways, a trend toward an increase in bronchoscopies per month was seen after stent placement. Comparing the stented versus nonstented patients, there was no improvement in lung function, no reduction in bronchoscopies per month, and no difference in airway patency for stented patients. Conclusion: Patients with DAS phenotypes that were treated with endobronchial stenting did not require less airway intervention or have greater final airway patency compared with the nonstented airways. Among the stented patients, the need for airway manipulation did not decrease after stent placement.

Learning Gain and Skill Retention Following Unstructured Bronchoscopy Simulation in a Low-fidelity Airway Model Background: Simulation is invaluable for bronchoscopy training. Studies report improved procedure time, dexterity/technique, and trainee satisfaction supported by low-fidelity and high-fidelity simulators in structured-training programs. We sought to determine (1) Learning-gain in bronchoscopic dexterity after a single 45-minute unstructured exposure using a low-fidelity simulator. (2) Whether acquired skills are maintained 8 weeks later, during which trainees receive no interim exposure to simulation or clinical bronchoscopy. Methods: Using a low-fidelity model, medical students were assessed for bronchoscopicdexterity before and after an unstructured, self-directed 45-minute simulation. Bronchoscopic dexterity was assessed according to: (1) Ability to enter a target-bronchus within a specified time. (2) The modified Bronchoscopy Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool (mBSTAT). Scores were compared at baseline, postsimulation, and 8 weeks postsimulation. Individual domains of the mBSTAT were compared with identify specific skills demonstrating more significant deterioration. Results: Twenty-eight medical students completed the initial-simulation session. Fifteen returned at 8 weeks. Statistically significant improvement in bronchoscopic-skills was observed immediately following the simulation session (mBSTAT scores 3.7±1.2 pretest vs. 7.0±0.9 posttest, P<0.001). mBSTAT scores had deteriorated significantly at 8 weeks (5.7±1.8, P=0.03) but remained superior to baseline scores (P=0.002). Of the 4 domains assessed, only Precision did not demonstrate any change between post-test and review assessments (P=0.14). All other domains demonstrated trends towards significant deterioration between posttest and review. Conclusion: A single 45-minute unstructured bronchoscopy simulation session resulted in significant improvement in bronchoscopic dexterity. Significant decay in bronchoscopic dexterity is observed, suggesting repeat simulation may be valuable following periods without bronchoscopy exposure.

#

Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,

Telephone consultation 11855 int 1193,