Abstract
Among the currently available strategies for sperm freezing, vitrification may be considered as the leading alternative to conventional cryopreservation. Nevertheless, a direct comparison of both techniques with respect to the iatrogenic sperm DNA damage has not been performed yet. As such, this study was focused to assess the static and dynamic behavior of human sperm DNA damage following thawing of cryopreserved or vitrified spermatozoa. Semen samples were obtained from fifty donors with a normal spermiogram, and divided into four aliquots. The first aliquot represented the neat sample. In the second aliquot the seminal plasma was discarded, and the resulting sperm pellet was resuspended in PBS. The third fraction was used for slow freezing and the fourth fraction was subjected to vitrification. Each set of samples was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and sperm DNA damage (SDF) was assessed using the chromatin-dispersion test following 0 h, 2 h, 4 h and 24 h of incubation. When comparing the rate of DNA fragmentation (r-SDF) at 2 h, significant differences were observed between the PBS group, cryopreserved (p .000) or vitrified semen (p .015). Furthermore, the sperm longevity comparison using Kaplan–Meier survival curves revealed significant differences between cryopreservation and vitrification (p .000). Our data suggest that exposure of spermatozoa to low temperatures, independently of the chosen freezing protocol, leads to a higher susceptibility of sperm DNA towards damage. This damage is nevertheless lower following vitrification in comparison to traditional cryopreservation. As vitrification leads to a smaller proportion of spermatozoa with DNA damage, we may recommend its use in reproductive techniques which rely on a longer sperm survival, such as artificial insemination.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.