Abstract
Purpose
The use of intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC) is becoming increasingly common in patients undergoing pectus excavatum (PE) repair. This study sought to evaluate the use of INC compared to traditional use of thoracic epidural (TE).
Methods
A retrospective review of 79 patients undergoing PE repair with either INC or TE from May 2009 to December 2019 was conducted. The operations were performed by four surgeons who worked together at four different hospitals and have the same standardized practice. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary variables included surgical time, total operating room time, operating room time cost, total hospital cost, inpatient opioid use, long-term opioid use after discharge, and postoperative complications.
Results
LOS decreased to 2.5 days in the INC group compared to 5 days in the TE group (p < 0.0001). Surgical time was increased in the INC group, but there was no difference in total OR time. The INC group experienced significantly lower hospital costs. Total hospital opioid administration was significantly lower in INC group, and there was a significant decrease in long-term opioid use in the INC group.
Conclusions
INC is a newer modality that decreases LOS, controls pain, and results in overall cost savings. We recommend that INC be included in the current practice for postoperative pain control in PE patients undergoing Nuss procedure.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.