Summary
Objectives
The goal of this study was to determine normal values for the FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module.
Design
A prospective monocentric observational cohort study.
Setting
We tested FACE-Q Satisfaction with Nose and Satisfaction with Nostrils in two groups of patients, seeking or not a rhinoplasty.
Participants
One hundred and four patients were included in the study, fifty-two in each group.
Main outcome measurements
Primary outcome was to identify possible cutting scores to establish normal values for each of the FQRM questionnaires.
Results
Regarding the Satisfaction with Nose scale, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001). Area under the ROC curve was 0.964 (95%CI= 0.931-0.997). Forty-seven points was the value presenting the best Youden index (Sensitivity = 96.2%, Specificity =86.5%). Regarding the Satisfaction with Nostrils scale, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001). Area under the ROC curve was 0.820 (95%CI= 0.741-0.899). Sixty-four points was the value presenting the best Youden index (Sensitivity=94.2%, Specificity=53.8%).
Conclusion
This is the first study to generate normative data for the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module. The findings presented here have important implications for future clinical care and research. The definition of a normal score can help practitioners to better analyze their patients and to support a therapeutic indication.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.