Developing effective methods to evaluate surgical outcomes is more important than ever. Peers, patients, and payers increasingly judge the quality of surgical procedures based on measurable outcomes. The government, health care review websites, and others are actively seeking benchmarks to compare our individual surgical results with those of other surgeons across the country and around the world. It is in our best interest to identify equitable methods of measuring our outcomes, and cosmetic surgery outcomes are among the most difficult to measure. Rating cosmetic results in rhinoplasty—with wide variability in what is considered ideal or is even possible for a given patient—is particularly challenging. Prior studies have examined patients' and surgeons' perceptions following rhinoplasty. However, both patients and surgeons have inherent biases that interfere with objective analyses of rhinoplasty outcomes. Unbiased casual observers are better suited to independently rate improvement following cosmetic rhinoplasty.
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00306932607174,00302841026182,alsfakia@gmail.com
Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου
Πληροφορίες
Ετικέτες
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
-
Publication date: Available online 25 July 2018 Source: Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology Author(s): Marco Ballestr...
-
Editorial AJR Reviewers: Heartfelt Thanks From the Editors and Staff Thomas H. Berquist 1 Share + Affiliation: Citation: American Journal...
-
Publication date: Available online 28 September 2017 Source: Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas Author(s): F.J. Navarro-Triviño
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.